|
Analyzing “The Family Portrait”
Kozain manages to depict the environment in
which him and his characters live so that the reader
receives a vivid picture of the scene where everything
happens. Looking at the title one understands the general
topic of the poem. It takes a similar format to a family
portrait; different characters in the same setting, held
together as a family and bound by circumstance. There is
perhaps a hint of bitterness in the title as a family
portrait is likely to be idealized and sentimental. The poem
contradicts this notion by present a harsh reality, with the
focus on the darker elements of life, using references to
crime, drugs and so forth to emphasize this point.
There is use of South African terms and ideas,
evident in the use of language such as “braaivleis”. The
reference to mandrax is also more localized since it was
particularly popular in South Africa amongst the poorer
“classes”. This emphasis on the setting stresses the
particular relevance of the subject to South Africa, sending
its message to those who populate the country, and evoking
the atmosphere which is so unique to the poverty-stricken
underbelly of South African life.
From the beginning we get a glimpse of
desperation and pain. This life is becoming too much for
them to handle. Aunt May seeks oblivion like a frightened
child. There is a feeling of claustrophobia in the “small
kitchen” making her seem captive in her surroundings. The
image of worn linoleum could be seen to draw parallels to
the lives of the downtrodden masses, having their lives and
freedom scraped away slowly by those who are allowed to grow
stronger at the expense of the others. Again this is
relevant to the huge rift between the “classes” in South
Africa caused by the socio-political situation of the past.
The use of unpleasant, dirty imagery is common.
The mood is “amber” orange tinted like an old photograph.
The colours of the poem all seem dull and cloudy; worn away.
The use of images such as “worn linoleum”, “braaivleis
juice”, and “dogturds” creates an almost sordid atmosphere,
evoking a feeling of sickness.
The idea of oblivion, of blocking things out is
repeated in many instances. Some seek comfort in drugs to
numb their minds, they block out the ways in which they
themselves have erred, as well as the atmosphere in which
they live, continuing life regardless of the vices they
adopt to cope with the situation around them. The narrator
has “switched off”, the mother has also “switched off”. In
“closing their eyes” they block out the emotions and the
reality in a form of sad desolate acceptance. The phrase
“stroke their lashes according to the latest fashion”
suggests a sort of pretence; the desperate wish to believe
that everything is alright.
There is a distinct feeling of apathy, or
rather of ideals and aspirations shattered by reality.
Nothing is ever finished or complete. This can be seen in
the inanimate surroundings; the way the house is represented
as ramshackle and ill-kempt, and the unhinged door nobody
seems to care to mend. Also in the situation of Gail and her
husband unable to reach their own goals while burdened with
a family. There is interesting use of words here; they are
“two children strong” - an ironic way of putting it, since
their own abilities to succeed in life are hindered by the
children. They dream of finishing their education, but we
can tell it is unlikely they will actually go through with
this plan. Theirs is a world of unfulfilled dreams.
There is also apathy towards the standards of
society. “Buckie” will not show guilt for his crime, still
“waving to passers by” despite the implication in his
friends suicide. He chooses apathy over awareness or
emotion. Even marriage seems to be of little consequence
here; phrases such as “her husband imported [his] latest
lover” and “a friends wife now his lover” show a lack of
caring about the emotion of the other, and disregard for
obligation or moral. It is also once again a reference to
vice, showing the decay of society. It seems the onslaught
of the world around them has been too much. They simply do
not care anymore.
Nevertheless a strange unity prevails. They are
bound together by family and circumstance, all sharing the
same broken down sense of despair; “broken togetherness” as
the poet puts it, despite the seemingly underhand nature of
many of the characters. Again a strange resignation to this
way of life is evident. The blood “runs thin”, but it is
still the same family blood upon which has been inflicted
the same diseased society. It is still “thicker than water”.
The poem gives a very relevant statement about
the lives of these people. Their actions may seem negligent,
but at the same time all are victims, their ways provoked by
society. It is an exploration of the loneliness and pain of
those living in an unfair world, and how they in fact become
part of it. The images of people, family and emotion turn
the emphasis to the human aspect still strongly present in
an inhuman environment.
BACK TO
ENGLISH LITERATURE
|