|
Reason in art can be seen as early as Giotto in
his Arena chapel frescos which are seen as a water-shed for
artistic development. It was the first example when art
attempted to move away from the confines of medieval art,
typified in elongated, rigid figures with delicate patterned
lines. The introduction of reason encouraged imaginative
iconography and the development of perspective as art became
an intellectual persuit no longer a vehicle for telling
stories to the illiterate. Reason in architecture took the
shape in striving for the 'perfect' form. Antiquity had
stressed an emphasis on harmony through mathematical
calculations of proportion and thus reasoning the structure
of a building. Brunelleschi and Alberti designed their
buildings around rigid modus operandi and proportions in
order to create such harmony, differentiating from the
Gothic architectural ideals of decoration and audacity. For
example, Brunelleschi's Capella Pazzi in Florence is split
into carefully structured units against its blank white
walls, which conveys not only classical order, but also
intellectual reasoning for its structure. Reason and
rational enquiry lead to the development of perspective, as
it was necessary to depict reality. Brunelleschi was
responsible for the mathematical equation of perspective,
yet another example of the marriage between art and reason.
A by-product of reason in the art world was the
development of humanism in the high renaissance. Humanism's
sense of enjoyment from natural beauty and truth was such a
contrast from the medieval church's rejection of beauty.
However, renaissance humanism was not a result of Classical
philosophy but more a union of Christian and Classical
thought. Alberti embodied this union and exemplified the
relationship of art and reason, being a philosopher, artist,
architect and mathematician all at once. This marriage of
intellect and art was allowed by the concept of reason,
since thought was attainable to all levels of class. His
personal humanistic faith combined Christianity with the
wisdom of the ancients and rationality: the very essence of
reason. Alberti drew his notions of beauty from Plato's
classical theories, thus accepting that truth equals beauty
equals wisdom and beauty has an objective actuality, as
opposed to a subjective opinion. Alberti took a firm stand
on reason and refused to use theoretical speculation in his
ideas. Alberti once stated, 'Everything is attributed to
reason, to method, to imitation, to measurement, nothing to
the creative faculty.'[5] However, Alberti's concepts did
not reflect popular ideas of reason in Italy and towards the
end of the 15th Century; his rational philosophies of art
became unpopular and were replaced by a mystical
interpretation of antiquity. For example, Alberti
interpreted Plato's theories on love as its social function
but later on the Neo-Platonist school explained Plato's love
theories as a contemplation of divine beauty.
Art allowed intellectual messages to be
transposed into a visual form as in Botticelli's Primavera.
Thus, through one's perception of an Idea one can create art
of intellectual superiority. Reason allowed art to be
interpreted personally by one's own thoughts since one must
question everything for oneself. According to Gombrich, the
renaissance thinkers reasoned that 'those who dwell in the
world above are not imprisoned in the body; they see what we
can only reason out. Thus, seeing becomes by virtue of its
speed and immediacy a favored symbol of higher knowledge.'
[6] Most ideologies of the renaissance came under the
umbrella of reason, since this was the only dominating theme
uniting all philosophies. However, one of the intellectual
aims of the renaissance was to find common ground between
the ancient philosophical traditions and amalgamate these
into one, finding one agreement for the notion of truth,
beauty and wisdom.
Neo-Platonism came about with the work of
Plotinus' Enneads which combined the philosophical
theorizing of the Genesis creation and the cosmology of
Plato's Timaeus. Neo-Platonic ideas were converted into art
in the form of allegorical and symbolic works, mostly in
pre-Christian mythologies. Art portrayed Neo-Platonism
through its reasoning of Platonic ideas into concepts of
beauty, wisdom and truth, depicted in art. Botticelli was
most renowned for his mythologies, which became more complex
and intellectually capable in time yet they can all be
allegorised to Christianity. The intellectual Marsilio
Ficino of the Medici court was the leader of Neo-Platonism
in Florence and was very influential in Botticelli's
iconography. Botticelli's Venus and Mars (c. 1485) is
entirely depicted from an interpretation of Plato's work by
Ficino which claims 'Mars is outstanding in strength…
because he makes men stronger, but Venus masters him Mars
can never master Venus[7] The painting depicts a comatozed,
almost naked, Mars whilst satyrs play with his armor and
Venus looks over him. Without the obvious mythological
meaning, the painting can be interpreted as a celebration of
love's (Venus) victory over war.
Botticelli's Primavera also depicts love as its
central theme, although its iconography is often disputed
due to its potential level of intense intellectuality. The
eight figures can all be identified as characters form
Classical mythology, for example the three graces and
Venus. Zephyr, Chloris and Flora, on the right of the
painting, symbolize the coming of spring and depict beauty
of the natural world. The three Graces on the left represent
refined pleasures of life and Mercury represents 'reason'.
Venus' prominent position in the middle symbolizes the
joining of Natural and Spiritual ideologies. This
masterpiece manages to create a visual equation for what
Neo-Platonism stood for: Nature plus Grace equals the Human
Ideal.
Reason in art's depictions are endless,
Leonardo typified the 'artist as a scientist', ignoring the
concept of absolute beauty. 'Provided he can make his
figures real, individual, and living it will not matter I
they do not conform to some absolute standard of beauty.'[8]
Raphael exhibited a more formal approach and can be viewed
as the 'artist as a scholar', thus Neo-Platonist art without
its soppiness. Raphael's Stanza della Segnatura in the
Vatican represents the fusion of Classical and Christian
cultures or pagan philosophy of the renaissance since the
frescos depict the school of Athens, Poetry, Theology and
Justice. According to Jean Seznec "The disciplined ordering
of all the elements in the ensemble ... is instantly and
strikingly apparent. In this realm, peopled by images in
which two worlds come face to face ... it is not the clash
of two armies which we hear, but the harmony of a
choir."[9]
The school of Athens (1510) epitomizes reason.
Its very subject is an index to classical philosophy; Plato
points to heaven signifying universal ideals and Aristotle
characterizes the practical view of the earth. The
monumental drawing almost summarizes the renaissance with
its contemporary portraits of Leonardo and Michealangelo to
depict ancient philosophers. Thus, the stanza demonstrates
the amalgamation of Classical and Renaissance cultures.
However, it was not long before this union was broken with a
darker cloud that descended across Europe towards the end of
the sixteenth century, such transition is depicted over the
thirty years (1508-41) it took Michelangelo to paint the
Sistine chapel. Perhaps it was inevitable that a period of
such splendor would have to come to a dramatic end; this
came about with the Reformation signifying the end of the
Italian renaissance. In 1508 Michelangelo epitomized all
that the renaissance stood for and the successful marriage
between art and reason. Michelangelo embraced Neo-Platonism
to the full, 'as a metaphysical justification of his own
self.'[10]
Michelangelo's depiction of Adam and Eve
depicts the beauty of the material world in every way.
Michelangelo reveals this notion in his poetry as well,
referring to the 'divine origin of beauty', yet over time,
he was to perform a u-turn in his ideologies of world
beauty. Clearly influence by the reformations beliefs of
solemn goodness reduced of all excesses and concepts of
beauty. His abolished ideas of beauty can be seen in his
completion of the Sistine chapel the fresco of the Last
Judgement. Instead, Michelangelo's figures lack grace and
beauty but ruggedly personify violent motion a struggle.
Michelangelo's change in philosophy indicates the end of the
Renaissance. Michelangelo's sonnets reveal this change in
perception of beauty. Beauty was no longer for the sake of
itself but a product of excesses of the renaissance.
Michelangelo stated 'Thus I now know how fraught with error
was the fond imagination which makes Art my idol and my
king, and how mistaken that earthly love which all men seek
in their own despite no brush, no chisel will quieten the
soul.'[11] Thus, the period of artistic 'indulgence' ended
with the burning of all 'vanities' under Savonarola and
strict Christianity returned. Although reason still resided
over the modern world, its relationship with art, and thus
its elevated stature, ended. The infiltration of Classical
influence at the beginning of the 14th century had started
the renaissance, when this interest died, so did the
renaissance. Ficino once blamed reason for making man
'restless and tormented'. However, this 'restlessness and
torment' certainly provided the right ambience for such a
splendid era of art. Ultimately, it was the unlikely union
between ancient philosophies and Christian theologies that
created the 'rebirth' of the renaissance, inspiring such
greatness. Burckhardt claims that the rise of the individual
was instrumental in the renaissances development:
'individualism was the period's greatest problem and
greatest asset'.[12] Through individualism came the
'universal man' who reasoned with his 'universal' knowledge
of the arts, sciences, politics and philosophy. Hence, art
could become an expression of oneself and one's feelings,
for example the journey of Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel
frescos. According to Leonardo, 'every painter paints
himself'[13]. Reason allowed freedom of iconography, since
the concept of more existing other than God had arisen
through scientific rationalism. The very fact that Vasari
kept account of renaissance artists in his book 'The lives
of Artists' prove their elevated status. Reason is
epitomized in the very fact that artists ceased to tell
stories and instead, used art as a means of studying and
recording nature, anatomy and expression, often in an
intellectually challenging way. The development of
perspective, oils, realism and humanism can all be viewed as
products of reason. However, what the renaissance did to
exceed the ancients in art was to apply lessons in science
and maths, therefore reason, to art, this was especially
evident in Leonardo and Brunelleschi's work. Reason allowed
renaissance art in Italy to take a huge step forward, after
a millennium of darkness and create some of the most
monumental works of art known to man.
WORD COUNT: 3,136
BIBLIOGRAPHY
'Artistic Theory in Italy (1450- 1600)
By Anthony Blunt (1975)
'Studies in Iconography'
By Erwin Panofsky (1962)
'Civilisation of the Renaissance in Italy.'
By Jacob Burkhardt.
'Symbolic Images'
By E. H. Gombrich (1978)
'Lives of the Artists'
By Vasari
'History of Western Philosophy'
By B. Russell
Montaigne's Essays: Book 3'
Internet Publication.
INTERNET RESOURCES
LECTURE NOTES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[2] 'Symbolic Images' by E. H. Gombrich (page 70)
[3][3] Montaigne's Essays: Book 3 (chapter 13)
[5] 'Artistic Theory in Italy 1450 to 1600' by Anthony Blunt
(page
21-22)
[6] ' Symbolic Images' by E. H. Gombrich (Page 6147)
[7] ' Symbolic Images' by E. H. Gombrich (Page 67)
[8] 'Artistic theory in Italy 1450 to1600' by Anthony Blunt
(page 31)
[9] 'The Survival of the Pagan Gods' by Jean Seznec (page
145)
[10] 'Studies in Iconography' by Harper and Rowe (page 180)
[11] From one of Michelangelo's sonnets on the Internet.
[12]'Civilisation of the Renaissance in Italy' by Jacob
Burckjardt.
[13] 'The Lives of Artists' by Vasari
1
2
BACK TO ART
|